US Air Force-2014-CMMI3

CMMI认证查询 cmmirz 7年前 (2014-09-25) 337次浏览 0个评论
Organization Name:
(组织名称)
US Air Force
Organizational Unit:
(组织单位)
76 SMXG, Tinker AFB, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Maturity Level:
(成熟度)
Maturity Level 3
Appraisal End Date:
(评估结束日期)
Sep 26, 2014
Lead Appraiser:
(主任评估师)
Lester Stamnas
Sponsor:
(发起人)
Michael Jennings
Sampling Summary:
(抽样汇总)
Sampling Factors: Location (Not Relevant: (Not Relevant: All BUs/SUs performed within Tinker AFB. No process distinctions are made based upon location within the Base.))
Customer (Not Relevant: (Not Relevant: All customers are organizational elements of the US Air Force. No Standard process distinctions are made based upon customer attributes.))
Size (Not Relevant: (Not Relevant: Size a partial factor accounted for Quality Reviews))
Organizational Structure (Not Relevant: (Not Relevant: All organizational elements are located at Tinker AFB. No Standard process distinctions are made based upon organization. Everyone follows the same standard processes.))
Type of Work: Work is largely based upon the life cycle selected, which is either Development (D) or Maintenance (M).
Engineering Discipline: Some projects deal with hardware products as well as software products. Options here would be software only (S), or software and hardware (SH). Hardware might be contracted out for implementation or built in house.
Quality Reviews: Projects whose effort estimates of the Product Release Cycle (PRC) are over 1500 hours are designated as Type 1. Type 1 must use a standard Peer Review (PR) process for product reviews for key engineering tasks and work products.
Sampling Factor Values: DEV (Type of Work): New development work – using dev life cycle uniquenesses
Maint (Type of Work): Maintenance work – using maintenance life cycle uniquenesses
S/W (Engineering Discipline): Software only projects
SH (Engineering Discipline): Software and hardware (SH) integration. Hardware might be contracted out or built in house.
PR – Type 1 (Quality Reviews): Projects whose effort estimates of the Product Release Cycle (PRC) are over 1500 hours are designated as Type 1. Type 1 must use a standard Peer Review (PR) process for product reviews for key engineering tasks and work products.
TR – Type 2 (Quality Reviews): Type 2, can either use the standard PR process or select a less formalized and less costly review called Technical Review (TR). This is an internal project tailoring decision. For example, if the delivered products are considered critical to the customer, the project can select PR.
Subgroups: D, PR, SH: Development, Peer Review, Software and Hardware
132 People, 4 Basic Units
– DEV
– SH
– PR – Type 1
M, TR, S: Maintenance, Technical Review, Software Only
97 People, 7 Basic Units
– TR – Type 2
– Maint
– S/W
M, PR, S: Maintenance, Peer Review, Software Only
172 People, 10 Basic Units
– S/W
– Maint
– PR – Type 1

版权所有丨如未注明 , 均为原创丨本网站采用BY-NC-SA协议进行授权
转载请注明原文链接:US Air Force-2014-CMMI3
喜欢 (0)
发表我的评论
取消评论

表情 贴图 加粗 删除线 居中 斜体 签到

Hi,您需要填写昵称和邮箱!

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址