Organization Name：
（组织名称） US Air Force
（组织名称） US Air Force
Organizational Unit：
（组织单位） 76 SMXG, Tinker AFB, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
（组织单位） 76 SMXG, Tinker AFB, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Maturity Level：
（成熟度） Maturity Level 3
（成熟度） Maturity Level 3
Appraisal End Date：
（评估结束日期） Sep 26, 2014
（评估结束日期） Sep 26, 2014
Lead Appraiser：
（主任评估师） Lester Stamnas
（主任评估师） Lester Stamnas
Sponsor：
（发起人） Michael Jennings
（发起人） Michael Jennings
- Sampling Summary：
（抽样汇总） -
Sampling Factors: Location (Not Relevant: (Not Relevant: All BUs/SUs performed within Tinker AFB. No process distinctions are made based upon location within the Base.))
Customer (Not Relevant: (Not Relevant: All customers are organizational elements of the US Air Force. No Standard process distinctions are made based upon customer attributes.))
Size (Not Relevant: (Not Relevant: Size a partial factor accounted for Quality Reviews))
Organizational Structure (Not Relevant: (Not Relevant: All organizational elements are located at Tinker AFB. No Standard process distinctions are made based upon organization. Everyone follows the same standard processes.))
Type of Work: Work is largely based upon the life cycle selected, which is either Development (D) or Maintenance (M).
Engineering Discipline: Some projects deal with hardware products as well as software products. Options here would be software only (S), or software and hardware (SH). Hardware might be contracted out for implementation or built in house.
Quality Reviews: Projects whose effort estimates of the Product Release Cycle (PRC) are over 1500 hours are designated as Type 1. Type 1 must use a standard Peer Review (PR) process for product reviews for key engineering tasks and work products.Sampling Factor Values: DEV (Type of Work): New development work – using dev life cycle uniquenesses
Maint (Type of Work): Maintenance work – using maintenance life cycle uniquenesses
S/W (Engineering Discipline): Software only projects
SH (Engineering Discipline): Software and hardware (SH) integration. Hardware might be contracted out or built in house.
PR – Type 1 (Quality Reviews): Projects whose effort estimates of the Product Release Cycle (PRC) are over 1500 hours are designated as Type 1. Type 1 must use a standard Peer Review (PR) process for product reviews for key engineering tasks and work products.
TR – Type 2 (Quality Reviews): Type 2, can either use the standard PR process or select a less formalized and less costly review called Technical Review (TR). This is an internal project tailoring decision. For example, if the delivered products are considered critical to the customer, the project can select PR.Subgroups: D, PR, SH: Development, Peer Review, Software and Hardware
132 People, 4 Basic Units
– DEV
– SH
– PR – Type 1
M, TR, S: Maintenance, Technical Review, Software Only
97 People, 7 Basic Units
– TR – Type 2
– Maint
– S/W
M, PR, S: Maintenance, Peer Review, Software Only
172 People, 10 Basic Units
– S/W
– Maint
– PR – Type 1
说明：该信息摘自CMMI官网公示，更多详情请点击这里查看。注：CMMI认证有效期3年，过期链接失效。
