| Sampling Factors: |
Location: Most of projects managed from Toronto site, however Some are managed from UK and the development performed in Canada.
Customer (Not Relevant: Not Relevant: The development is performed with the same internal processes for all the customers)
Size: Projects are managed in a different way according to their size and criticality. 3 values are considered Critical Project (CP), A2 (large) and A1 (Medium).
Organizational Structure (Not Relevant: Most of projects managed from Toronto site, however some are managed from UK and the development performed in Canada. It is redundant with Location)
Type of Work (Not Relevant: Development activities and installation for all the projects) |
| Sampling Factor Values: |
UK (Location): Project Management with some Chorus 2.0 UK tailoring
Non-UK (Location): Project Management with some Chorus 2.0 Canada tailoring
CP (Size): Critical projects – the contract value is very large (> 150 m€) , The complexity is high and the risks are critical
A2 (Size): Large projects – the contract value is large (> 30 m€ and < 150=”” m€)=”” ,=”” the=”” complexity=”” and=”” the=”” risks=”” are=””>
A1 (Size): Medium projects – the contract value is large (>10 M€ and < 30=”” m€)=”” ,=”” the=”” complexity=”” and=”” the=”” risks=”” are=””> |
| Subgroups: |
SG-01: Critical Project managed from UK
467 People, 1 Basic Units
– UK
– CP
SG-02: Critical Projects managed from Toronto
300 People, 4 Basic Units
– CP
– Non-UK
SG-03: A2 projects managed in Toronto
130 People, 5 Basic Units
– Non-UK
– A2
SG-04: A1 project managed from Toronto
100 People, 5 Basic Units
– A1
– Non-UK |