| Sampling Factors: |
Location (Not Relevant: Multiple – San Diego (USA), Galati (Romania), Seoul (Korea), Beijing (China), Ismaning (Germany), Ottawa (Canada), Tokyo (Japan) and France (Grenoble & Les Ulis). Note: San Diego has no Auto development.)
Customer (Not Relevant: 2 types – ITAR and non-ITAR customers. Note: ITAR applies only to Professional Services A&D customers – it does not apply to Auto but the same process is used for each.)
Size: Small and large.
Organizational Structure (Not Relevant: The organization has 2 main divisions, Professional Services and Automobile Solutions. Both use the same process.)
Type of Work (Not Relevant: The same process is used for all work types.) |
| Sampling Factor Values: |
Small (Size): overall project work effort < 1250=””>
Large (Size): overall project work effort = or > 1250 hours |
| Subgroups: |
Small: A Delivery Director can, for given reasons, state that a small project should be run as a large project. PMs may adopt the large project process for small projects, bot not vice versa.
77 People, 264 Basic Units
– Small
Large: A Delivery Director can, for given reasons, state that a large project should be run as a small project. PMs may not adopt the small project process for large projects.
293 People, 100 Basic Units
– Large |