Fiserv-2016-CMMI3

CMMI认证查询 cmmirz 8年前 (2016-11-02) 792次浏览 0个评论
Organization Name:
(组织名称)
Fiserv
Organizational Unit:
(组织单位)
Financial and Risk Management Solutions (FRMS)
Maturity Level:
(成熟度)
Maturity Level 3
Appraisal End Date:
(评估结束日期)
Nov 03, 2016
Lead Appraiser:
(主任评估师)
John Hostetler
Sponsor:
(发起人)
Nick Calcanes
Sampling Summary:
(抽样汇总)
Sampling Factors: Location (Not Relevant: No difference – Multiple locations all apply same PDLC or SDLC exactly the same)
Customer (Not Relevant: No difference – Although multi-customers exists, the products created for these customers are developed with the same PDLC/SDLC regardless.)
Size (Not Relevant: No difference – Whether it be small, medium or large efforts, all of the efforts (size) apply the same PDLC without tailoring.)
Organizational Structure (Not Relevant: No difference – Only one org. structure exists.)
Type of Work (Not Relevant: No difference – Multiple product lines exists per the description of the appraisal plan, but all apply the same PDLC/SDLC regardless of work or product.)
Product Line: No signficant sampling factors given all efforts use/apply the PDLC the same across FRMS. Thus, the “null” factor was added to show either that any/all projects were considered who had finished or near finished their effort within the PDLC or lifecycle. So either Product-Line (which means any/all project efforts were a possibility) or “Null” meaning no projects
Sampling Factor Values: In (Product Line): Any/all FRMS project efforts were considered for sampling
Out or Null (Product Line): No project efforts were considered for sampling
Subgroups: Product Line: Product Line (Risk/Payment/ CLECM (Cash & Logistics Enterprise Content Management). Out of the nine (9) possible, two (2) projects or BUs were selected.
864 People, 9 Basic Units
– In

版权所有丨如未注明 , 均为原创丨本网站采用BY-NC-SA协议进行授权
转载请注明原文链接:Fiserv-2016-CMMI3
喜欢 (0)
发表我的评论
取消评论

表情 贴图 加粗 删除线 居中 斜体 签到

Hi,您需要填写昵称和邮箱!

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址